Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine is a membership-based umbrella organization of anti-abortion medical groups newly created to influence court cases on abortion.


Summary Extremism Key Players Influence Financial Related Orgs

Summary

Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine is a newly created membership-based umbrella organization of five anti-abortion medical groups. Despite its name, AHM’s warped interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath directly contradicts the four principles of medical ethics by ignoring patients’ well-being and providing a limited, biased scope of care through coercive practices. 

Aptly described by The Intercept as a shadow medical community, AHM is comprised of five existing organizations: the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds), the Catholic Medical Association, the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA) and the Coptic Medical Association of North America. AHM’s primary mission is to dismiss the necessity of and obstruct access to abortion care; additionally, AHM espouses transphobia. 

AHM’s website first appeared in the Internet Archive library on November 25, 2021. AHM filed for incorporation in Texas on August 5, 2022 and became tax-exempt in February 2023 as a non-profit organization registered in Tennessee. The moniker “Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine” appeared as early as September 2021, when the five groups under this name “applauded” Texas’ Senate Bill 8. Before AHM was officially formed, these groups worked together in various configurations to push anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQIA+ narratives, typically indicating that it represents “over 30,000 physicians who practice according to the Hippocratic Oath”; this 30,000 figure is the same one used when the AHM name was adopted. 

On November 18, 2022, three months after AHM filed incorporation in Texas, the organization, along with AAPLOG, ACPeds, CMDA and four anti-abortion doctors, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas’ Amarillo division asking to overturn the FDA’s approval of the abortion medication drug mifepristone. The lawsuit was purposefully filed to be overseen by anti-abortion judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in an example of forum shopping. Having no substantive claims or a procedural leg-up, AHM et al. is arguing that 1) the FDA’s approval of mifepristone 23 years ago violated the Administrative Procedures Act, 2) the FDA’s approval and regulation of the drug lacked “sufficient evidence” and 3) the FDA’s approval of the drug and subsequent Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) modifications violated the Comstock Act of 1873. 

Last updated 4/6/2023.

Extremism

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Is Primarily Concerned With Obstructing Access To Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Branded “Essential Hippocratic Oath,” A Warped Interpretation Of The Actual Hippocratic Oath, Instructs Its Members To Obstruct Access To Essential Medical Care By Providing Limited And Biased Medical Treatment. “As members of the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, we affirm our agreement to practice according to the Essential Hippocratic Oath, which states: … I will not help a woman obtain an abortion. In purity and holiness I will maintain the utmost respect for human life from the moment of fertilization until the moment of natural death, carefully guarding my role as a healer.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 3/28/23] 

  • Ironically, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Disobeys The Four Principles Of Medical Ethics By Ignoring Patients’ Well-Being And Individual Needs Through Coercion And Bias. “Four fundamental principles are widely recognized as guides to practice: beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Beneficence requires that treatment and care do more good than harm; that the benefits outweigh the risks, and that the greater good for the patient is upheld. Providing inaccurate and misleading information violates the principle of beneficence because it is not patient-centered and does not fully consider the patient’s well-being. Anti-abortion ideology thus supersedes the needs, values, and preferences of the woman seeking care. Respect for autonomy is similarly not expressed, because a key component of autonomy is having the information needed to make an informed decision and the ability to make medical decisions free of coercion.” [AMA Journal of Ethics, 3/20/18]
Close This Read More

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Denies The Existence Of Transgender Identities

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Falsely Claims That Sex And Gender Are The Same, Fueling Transphobia And Stigmatizing Gender-Affirming Health Care. “Our Values … Sanctity of the body asserting no difference between biological sex and gender except in the case of rare, diagnosable disorders of sexual development.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 3/28/23]

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Signed A Letter Asking The Department Of Health And Human Services To Stop Its Proposed Non-Discrimination Rule, Which Would Interpret Section 1557 Of The Affordable Care Act To Define Sex Discrimination As Inclusive Of Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity, As Well As Strengthen Non-Discrimination Protections For Pregnant People. [Ethics and Public Policy Center, 3/11/22]

  • The Letter Cites Medical Myths About Gender-Affirming Care. “[T]hese policies would be devastating for people—most especially children—struggling with gender identity issues. It would require dangerous and harmful treatments on physically healthy individuals that in many cases will lead to permanent sterility without off-setting mental health benefits. Under cover of ‘anti-discrimination’ the proposal would upend centuries of scientific understanding of what it means to be a man or a woman with respect to medicine and biology. Further, religious health care professionals and entities, as well as those who have scientific and medical objections to transition treatments, would be required to perform them.” [Ethics and Public Policy Center, 3/11/22]
Close This Read More

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Denies That Abortion Is Essential Healthcare

As Opponents Of Reproductive Freedom And Medical Consensus, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Believes That Abortion Is Not Health Care. “Abortion is not healthcare. As physicians and other healthcare professionals, we know that when we care for pregnant women, we are caring for two distinct patients. … The science is clear – at the moment of fertilization, a new distinct, living and whole human being comes into existence.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 11/1/2021]

  • Several Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Partnering Organizations Called For Abortion Care To Be Suspended At The Start Of The COVID-19 Pandemic, Against The Expertise Of The American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists. “As representatives of over 30,000 physicians who practice according to the Hippocratic Oath, the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), the American College of Pediatricians, Christian Medical & Dental Associations, the Catholic Medical Association, and the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons decry the call to continue elective abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic made by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and others which falsely characterize elective abortion as essential healthcare. … ACOG spinning ‘elective’ abortion into ‘essential’ health care is more of the same. Continuing to perform elective abortions during a pandemic is medically irresponsible. Elective abortion is neither ‘essential’ nor ‘urgent,’ but it does consume critical resources such as masks, gloves, and other personal protective equipment, and unnecessarily exposes patients and physicians to pathogens.” [AAPLOG, accessed 3/28/23]

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Spreads Medical Disinformation Which Falsely Links Accessing Abortion Care To Adverse Health Outcomes. “The evidence is clear that abortions increase the risk of preterm delivery in future pregnancies, increase a woman’s risk of mental health disorders and suicide and increase her risk of breast cancer if she has not yet had a full-term pregnancy. These risks, and the risks of her dying from abortion related complications, are even higher if the abortion is done in the second trimester and beyond.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 11/1/2021]

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Infantilizes Pregnant People For Determining Their Own Reproductive Health Outcomes. “It is time for those of us in the medical profession to boldly defend the lives of all of our patients and demand that our preborn patients be protected and our pregnant patients be empowered instead of lied to. Women and their children deserve our support, not the destruction of abortion.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 11/1/2021]

Close This Read More

Like Many Anti-Abortion Groups, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Villainizes Fetal Tissue Research

Prior To Its Official Formation, The Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Member Organizations Decried Fetal Tissue Research In A 2020 Statement On COVID-19 Vaccines. “It is … profoundly important to recognize the vaccines that may have been developed with the use of abortion-derived fetal cell lines. This awareness is necessary from the perspective of both the health care professional and the patient, and every participant in this process deserves to know the source of the vaccine used to allow them to follow their moral conscience. It is long overdue for researchers to abandon the use of abortion-derived cells.” [American College of Pediatricians, 11/2020]

Close This Read More

When Texas’ S.B. 8 Took Effect, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Issued A Congratulatory Statement

When Texas’ Six-Week Abortion Ban Enforced By Civil Lawsuits Took Effect In September 2021, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Applauded The Ban. “We represent approximately 30,000 physicians and other healthcare professionals who believe all pregnant women and their preborn babies deserve excellent healthcare. As such, we applaud Texas’s passion for protecting preborn children.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 9/2021]

  • Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Uses Medical Disinformation About Abortion Care. “The medical evidence very clearly shows that it causes an increased risk of preterm birth in future pregnancies, increased risk of breast cancer, higher risk of mental health disorders (including suicide) and a significant risk for maternal mortality.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 9/2021]
  • Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Uses Infantilizing Language Toward Pregnant People. “Abortion is not healthcare for the preborn child or her mother. … Since it is an antiquated myth that an unplanned pregnancy ruins every chance a woman or her child has to succeed in life, we recommend supporting women throughout and after their unplanned pregnancies.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, 9/2021]
Close This Read More

Key Players

Registered Agent For Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Texas Incorporation

Leah Davis

Davis Is Listed As Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Registered Agent With The Texas Comptroller. [Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, accessed 3/28/23]

Davis Is A Partner At Morgan Williamson LLP In Amarillo, Texas. [NARAL Pro-Choice America, 3/1/23]

Davis Is A Member Of The Christian Legal Society, Which Filed An Amicus Brief In Support Of Mississippi In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [NARAL Pro-Choice America, 3/1/23]

Close This Read More

CEO, AAPLOG And Associate Scholar, Charlotte Lozier Institute

Dr. Christina Francis, MD

Francis Is Listed As The President Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine In A March 2022 Letter Organized By The Ethics And Public Policy Center.  [Ethics and Public Policy Center, 3/11/22]

At A February 2022 AAPLOG Conference, Francis Informed Attendees Of The Newly Formed Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine And Encouraged Them To Serve As Expert Witnesses In Upcoming Court Cases. “Last February, at a conference hosted by her organization, the American Association of Pro-Life OB/GYNs, Dr. Christina Francis made an exciting announcement. She and her colleagues were making an impassioned pitch for the medical providers attending the conference to train as expert witnesses for impending court cases—and to be ready to push information about the dangers of the rising threat of medication abortion, in particular. She told the attendees that AAPLOG would be joining together with the American College of Pediatricians—a right-wing, anti-abortion organization, often confused with the American Academy of Pediatrics—and with the Catholic Medical Association and Christian Medical and Dental Association to create a new umbrella group: the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. ‘Once we are official, we’ll be coordinating a lot of these expert witness trainings,’ she said.” [The Nation, 3/16/23]

Close This Read More

Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom

Erin Hawley

Erin Hawley, Wife Of Anti-Choice Senator Josh Hawley, Is A Key Lawyer On The FDA Lawsuit. “Erin Morrow Hawley, an attorney and wife of one of Missouri’s senators, is at the center of a federal lawsuit in Texas that could cancel approval of a common drug used to terminate pregnancies. Hawley is one of the key lawyers fighting to end the Food and Drug Administration’s decades-old approval of mifepristone … Whether or not Hawley and the other attorneys on the Texas case are successful, they are pushing the legal envelope following the end of Roe. Hawley is helping to pioneer a new frontier of abortion litigation targeting existing — sometimes longstanding — laws and regulations that help uphold abortion access. [St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 3/17/23]

Close This Read More

American Association Of Pro-Life Obstetricians And Gynecologists

American Association Of Pro-Life Obstetricians And Gynecologists Is A Member Organization Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 4/6/23]

Close This Read More

American College Of Pediatricians

American College Of Pediatricians Is A Member Organization Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 4/6/23]

Close This Read More

Catholic Medical Association

Catholic Medical Association Is A Member Organization Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 4/6/23]

Close This Read More

Christian Medical & Dental Associations

Christian Medical & Dental Associations Is A Member Organization Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 4/6/23]

Close This Read More

Coptic Medical Association Of North America

Coptic Medical Association Of North America Is A Member Organization Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, accessed 4/6/23]

Close This Read More

Alliance Defending Freedom

Alliance Defending Freedom Is Representing The Anti-Abortion Plaintiffs In Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food And Drug Administration et al. [Alliance Defending Freedom, accessed 3/28/23] 

Close This Read More

Influence

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Is The Primary Plaintiff In A Federal Court Case Attempting To Overturn The FDA’s Approval Of The Abortion Drug Mifepristone

In November 2022, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Filed A Lawsuit Against The FDA, Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food And Drug Administration et al. “After two decades of engaging the FDA to no avail, Plaintiffs now ask this Court to do what the FDA was and is legally required to do: protect women and girls by holding unlawful, setting aside, and vacating the FDA’s actions to approve chemical abortion drugs and eviscerate crucial safeguards for those who undergo this dangerous drug regimen.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., Case 2:22-cv-00223-Z, 11/18/22]

  • Without Having Any Legitimate Scientific Standing, Plaintiffs Claim That The FDA Should Not Have Approved Mifepristone 23 Years Ago, Did Not Have Sufficient Evidence Of Its Safety And Efficacy And Violated The Comstock Act. “The plaintiffs claim, among other things, that the agency (1) impermissibly used a regulatory approval pathway that is only available for treating serious or life-threatening illnesses (and that pregnancy is not such an illness); (2) failed to examine or inappropriately disregarded scientific evidence in approving and setting distribution controls for the drug; and (3) ignored the so-called Comstock Act, federal criminal provisions that restrict the distribution of drugs or other abortion-related articles through the mail or other carriers.” [Congressional Research Service, 2/14/23]
  • Plaintiffs’ Claims Are Speculative And Rife With Anti-Abortion Disinformation. “The filing is a jumbled mess of suspect assertions, cloaked in inflammatory and medically inaccurate language. The filing refers to medication abortion as ‘chemical’ abortion and claims that mifepristone ‘starves the baby to death.’ It alleges that medication abortion is far riskier than procedural abortion or carrying a pregnancy to term, which the plaintiffs argue ‘rarely’ leads to threatening complications. They call mifepristone an ‘endocrine disrupter’ that could threaten the normal development of adolescents who take it. And they assert that individuals suffering complications from medication abortion could ‘overwhelm’ the health care system, leading to a flood of blood transfusions that ‘exacerbates the current critical national blood shortage.’” [The Intercept, 2/28/23]
  • Plaintiffs’ Legal Claims Have No Substance. “There are so many problems with the federal case in Texas challenging the approval of mifepristone, the first of two drugs given as part of a medication abortion. On the procedural side of things, just to name a few, the statute of limitations has long run out, the plaintiffs have not exhausted their administrative remedies, they haven’t identified a provision of law that has been violated, and their claimed injury makes no sense. On substance, again just to name a few, mifepristone is one of the safest drugs on the market, pregnancy is a medical condition for which the FDA can approve drugs, and the act on which the case relies has been basically a dead letter for a century. This case really is frivolous and should garner no real attention.” [Slate, 3/21/23]
  • Plaintiffs’ Evidence Is Flawed And Cherry-Picked. “The openly anti-abortion federal judge presiding over Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA could, at least temporarily, ban abortion drugs any day now. But if he does, reproductive-health care experts say it will be based on deeply flawed evidence that largely rests on cherry-picked studies and a handful of anecdotes from a handful of anti-abortion doctors.” [New Jersey Monitor, 2/10/23]
  • Plaintiffs’ Claims Of Mifepristone’s Safety Lack Any Evidence. “The plaintiffs’ lawyers contended that what they called ‘chemical abortion’ causes ‘cramping, heavy bleeding and severe pain’ and that the F.D.A. had never adequately evaluated the scientific evidence for safety. ‘How many women must die or come close to death before the F.D.A. takes mifepristone off the market?’ said Mr. Baptist, who is also with the Alliance Defending Freedom. Lawyers for the F.D.A. and Danco said that bleeding and cramping were normal consequences of the process of terminating a pregnancy, a sign that the pregnancy tissue was being expelled. They cited years of scientific studies that show that serious complications are rare and that patients need hospitalization less than 1 percent of the time.” [New York Times, 3/15/23]
  • Plaintiffs Rely On Infantilizing Pregnant People To Plead Their Case. “[T]he FDA failed America’s women and girls when it chose politics over science and approved chemical abortion drugs for use in the United States. … After two decades of engaging the FDA to no avail, Plaintiffs now ask this Court to do what the FDA was and is legally required to do: protect women and girls by holding unlawful, setting aside, and vacating the FDA’s actions to approve chemical abortion drugs and eviscerate crucial safeguards for those who undergo this dangerous drug regimen.” [Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., Case 2:22-cv-00223-Z, 11/18/22]

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Strategically Filed Its Lawsuit In The United States District Court For The Northern District Of Texas’ Amarillo Division. “The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a new anti-abortion umbrella group that is spearheading a sweeping federal challenge to medication abortion, incorporated in Texas just months before filing suit. The incorporation documents, obtained from the Texas secretary of state, provide further evidence that the plaintiffs cherry-picked a court they believed would be amenable to their arguments, an act of forum shopping that was orchestrated to land the case before Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump-appointed darling of the far right. The Alliance incorporated in Amarillo in August 2022 … Three months later, the lawsuit was filed in the same Texas Panhandle city where Kacsmaryk hears all federal civil cases.”  [The Intercept, 2/28/23]

  • The Lawsuit Was Purposefully Filed This Way So That Anti-Abortion Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk Would Hear The Case. “When anti-abortion groups wanted to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of an abortion-inducing drug, they didn’t file the lawsuit in Maryland, where the FDA is headquartered, or in any state where the pill is still legally prescribed. They filed it in Amarillo, a Texas city that didn’t have an abortion clinic even before the state all but banned the procedure. But Amarillo does have a federal courthouse with, importantly, just one federal judge presiding. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk hears 95% of the cases filed in Amarillo.” [The Texas Tribune, 3/15/23]

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine And Accompanying Plaintiffs Are Represented By The Southern Poverty Law Center-Designated Hate Group Alliance Defending Freedom. [Alliance Defending Freedom, accessed 3/28/23]

Close This Read More

If Successful, The Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Litigation Has The Potential To Cause Irreparable Harm For Pregnant People And Beyond

If Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food And Drug Administration et al. Is Decided In Favor Of The Plaintiffs, This Would Cause Significant Harm To Pregnant People. “Plaintiffs’ speculative assertions of injury—made months and even decades after the agency actions they challenge—are unsupported by any evidence that Plaintiffs will be harmed by the availability of mifepristone absent an injunction. In contrast, issuance of a preliminary injunction would cause significant harm, depriving patients of a safe and effective drug that has been on the market for more than two decades.” [FDA and DOJ opposition, Case 2:22-cv-00223-Z, 1/13/23] 

An Anti-Reproductive Freedom Decision Would Harm The Public Interest. [I]t would upend the status quo and the reliance interests of patients and doctors who depend on mifepristone. … The public interest would be dramatically harmed by effectively withdrawing from the marketplace a safe and effective drug that has lawfully been on the market for twenty-two years.” [FDA and DOJ opposition, Case 2:22-cv-00223-Z, 1/13/23] 

The Removal Of Mifepristone From The Market Would Exacerbate Inequitable Health And Socioeconomic Outcomes For Parents And Children. “Denial of abortion is in turn associated with numerous harms, including poor birthing and infant health outcomes, higher rates of poverty, and lower educational attainment for both parents and children. And because carrying a pregnancy to term is 14 times more risky than early abortion, foreclosing access to medication abortion would likely lead to a steep rise in birth-related mortality rates. Evidence shows that States with restrictive abortion laws have higher morbidity and mortality rates. And estimates suggest that should a total abortion ban go into effect nationwide, those rates would rise by 21% overall purely due to the increased risks associated with bearing a child, with Black women experiencing the highest estimated increase—33%. Accordingly, impeding access to medication abortion, the method currently accounting for the majority of all abortions, would undoubtedly lead to an unprecedented spike in mortality, worsening a crisis already disproportionately faced by Black women.” [Amicus Brief of Democratic State Attorneys General, Case 2:22-cv-00223-Z, 2/10/23] 

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Anti-Abortion Narratives Are Fueling A Hostile Culture Toward Reproductive Freedom And Equitable Health Care Access. “While the alternate narratives pushed by groups like AAPLOG may be politically powerful, they are also dangerous, offering the imprimatur of science without sound foundational support. ‘When you have arguments about science that are not based that much in evidence, not only is it confusing and obviously can lead to really bad outcomes, but it’s also disenfranchising,’ [law professor Mary] Ziegler said. ‘Because normal people don’t know anything about these topics, right? They don’t know about the relative rate of complications of mifepristone. And so if what’s really going on here is a struggle over constitutional values and ethics and so on, we should be telling the truth about that.’” [The Intercept, 2/28/23]

Close This Read More

Organizations Submitting Amicus Briefs On Behalf Of Plaintiffs In Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine et al. v. U.S. Food And Drug Administration et al. Are A Who’s-Who Of Anti-Abortion And Anti-LGBTQIA+ Organizations And Hate Groups

Organizations That Submitted Amicus Briefs For Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine et al. Include Charlotte Lozier Institute, Concerned Women For America, Ethics And Public Policy Center, Family Research Council, Human Coalition And Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. [Justia, accessed 3/28/23]

Close This Read More

Without The “Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine” Moniker, Its Member Organizations Have Advocated For Anti-Abortion Legislation And Administration Measures

Four Of Five Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Partnering Organizations Supported The Anti-Abortion Congressional Bill “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.” “Over 30,000 medical professionals from the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians, Christian Medical & Dental Associations, Catholic Medical Association and Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, supported the bill. In a statement, they said, ‘There is no scientific or legal reason to distinguish between human beings born after an attempted abortion and human beings born after attempted live birth. In cases where the mother’s life actually is in danger in the latter half of pregnancy, there is not time for an abortion. … We can, and do, save the life of the mother through delivery of an intact infant in a hospital where both the mother and her newborn can receive the care that they need. There is no medical reason to intentionally kill that fetal human being.’” [The Center Square, 1/13/23]

All Five Of Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine’s Partnering Organizations Supported A Letter From Congressional Republicans To The DOJ And HHS About Conscience Protections, Which When Unregulated Hinder Access To Abortion Care. [U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer, 8/18/21]

Close This Read More

Financial

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Filed Its Incorporation In Texas Three Months Before Filing Its Lawsuit Against The FDA

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Was Incorporated In Texas On August 5, 2022 And Shares An Address With Christian Medical & Dental Associations In Bristol, Tennessee. 

[Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, accessed 3/28/23]

Close This Read More

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Is Registered In Tennessee As A 501(c)(3) Non-Profit

Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine Was Registered In Tennessee As A 501(c)(3) Non-Profit In February 2023 And Has Tax-Exempt Status.

[ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, accessed 3/28/23]

Close This Read More
Scroll Up